Analyze

SEO score reflects title relevance, meta description quality, heading structure, keyword alignment, word count, internal links, and image alt text coverage.

AEO score reflects answer structure, FAQ readiness, schema markup, citation signals, and how directly the content answers the target keyword’s intent.

E-E-A-T score reflects authority signals, source support, freshness cues, expertise markers, and content credibility patterns.

Scores are 0–100. The plugin deliberately avoids giving 90+ unless a page is already performing very well — a score of 70–80 is solid for most pages. Focus on the gap between your current score and what a good page looks like, not on chasing a perfect 100.

The priority system tells you how urgently a page needs attention. It is calculated from the combined SEO and AEO scores, the number and severity of identified gaps, and whether competitor pages have signals your page is missing.

Below the priority band, the plugin shows a plain-language explanation of why this page received its score — which specific signals pushed it into this band.

The highest-impact improvement identified for this page. The plugin surfaces one or two actions here — the changes most likely to move your scores meaningfully. Use this as your starting point before reading the full list of gaps or suggestions.

Fix-this-first actions are drawn from the top issues list, competitor gaps, and quick wins, filtered down to what the analysis considers most valuable given the current state of the page.

Gaps are problems detected on the page — missing keyword in the title, weak meta description, no FAQ structure, insufficient heading depth, missing alt text, and similar issues. Each gap is a specific signal the plugin found lacking.

Quick wins are short, concrete actions that can be applied relatively easily — adding one FAQ block, linking to a related page, improving the introduction, or strengthening an H2. These are ranked roughly by impact.

The plugin generates alternative versions of your title tag, meta description, and page introduction. These are suggestions only — review each one critically before applying. The AI is instructed to be specific and keyword-relevant, but the final judgment of what fits your page and brand is always yours.

• Title suggestions are optimized for keyword inclusion and click-through appeal
• Meta suggestions aim for 120–160 characters with a clear value proposition
• Intro improvement suggests how to lead with a direct answer before expanding into detail

Up to five question-and-answer pairs designed to improve your page’s answer-readiness. If your page already has an FAQ section, the plugin reads those questions and uses them as context. If not, it generates new ones based on the keyword and content.

FAQ content directly affects your AEO score — pages with clear, structured FAQ sections are easier for answer engines to surface. Adding even one well-written FAQ block can meaningfully lift the AEO score.

A JSON-LD schema block suggested for this page. The plugin proposes the most appropriate schema type — typically Article, FAQPage, or Product for WooCommerce pages — along with 1–3 key properties. Review it before applying; do not apply schema that does not accurately reflect the page content.

A projected view of what your scores could look like if you applied the top suggestions. This is an estimate, not a guarantee — it is designed to help you decide whether the effort is worthwhile, not to promise specific score improvements.

Only shown when competitor URLs were added. This section compares your page against the fetched competitor content, highlighting what they have that your page is missing — stronger FAQ structure, more heading depth, schema types you lack, or content signals that are common among ranking pages but absent from yours.

Competitor gaps feed directly into the fix-this-first and top issues sections, making them more specific and accurate than analysis without comparisons.